When a typical individual considers how to review an article, they typically assume that the goal is to uncover every flaw and be as harsh as possible. The majority of concerns about the article critique are clarified by our instruction. You can learn more by following these fundamental guidelines, explanations, and an illustration. Even if your college lecturer gives you confusing directions, our article critique guide will help you understand as you go along!
What is a critique of an article?
Simply put, an article critique is a kind of essay writing in which the author should offer a thorough, objective evaluation of the subject topic. Of course, it will include at the very least a synopsis of the material and background data on the author (if it is necessary). It need not, however, become a list of the contents! Helping your audience understand all of the article’s primary elements as well as the author’s thoughts, objectives, or main purposes is part of knowing how to summarize and critique an article. Every article critique’s primary goal is to identify the piece’s advantages and disadvantages while maintaining a detached tone in terms of subjective opinions. Since it must be written in formal language and have a specific structure, one should adhere to the standard academic format, which calls for an analysis to have a strong introduction, body, and conclusion.
The challenge is to read it more than once and analyze how you feel about it from the perspective of academic goals and overall academic value. Speaking of the goal, when writing an article critique, you must sum up the author’s important points. Give a succinct explanation of why it matters in your particular situation. Next, don’t forget to highlight all the fascinating details that contribute to demonstrating the article’s value. Finally, discuss the author’s goals and perspective on the subject. The major goal must be summarized in the article critique’s concluding section. When learning how to write an article critique, keep in mind that the most crucial section is your conclusion, where you can express to the reader whether you concur or disagree with the author. It is where you should offer arguments in favor of your points and cite relevant passages from the article or other academic sources.
How to Write a Step-by-Step Article Critique
It is easier than it seems to write an article critique. When working with sophisticated academic writing, it is only required to understand where to begin and how to align your critique. Therefore, when you learn how to critique an article, stick to these straightforward four steps:
Spend sufficient time reading the article. Understanding every concept presented in your reading material requires this method. It could occasionally be difficult to comprehend. To see whether it makes more sense, go over it one again or read it out loud. If you’re unsure, look up related information or articles that go into more detail. As you critique the essay, keep in mind how easy it is to read and understand.
Make a note. When the article is understandable to you and you know (roughly!) what it is about, it is time to read it again in a new way and make notes to aid your progress. For instance, you should think about it as something that is worth talking about if you come across anything intriguing or hear an argument that moves you. You can either quote the passage or argue from it to support your position.
Create an outline from your notes. There is a purpose for your notes. As you examine the crucial details, you may include them into your framework and use your points as the main sentences. As your article critique develops, add comments or your own thoughts to help your audience comprehend the points you are making.
Your Opinion Comes Here. Here is where you should succinctly express your opinions and say whether you like the article or thought it had too many weak or ambiguous passages. Your arguments should, of course, be backed up by some convincing evidence.
Always include a note on your Bibliography / References page if you examined any sources other than the article in question or used any other references.
Learn about the structure and format of article critiques.
Unless otherwise stated, your article critique should adhere to the following guidelines:
Outline. You need to include background information about the piece and explain the author’s main ideas without turning your introduction into a summary, thus it should look like this. Approach situations with a critical eye.
thesis assertion If you are dealing with a research paper critique, your thesis statement should describe the significance of the piece or approach.
Content’s Goal. In this section of the body paragraphs, you must rehearse the author’s thoughts and compare them to accepted wisdom. Find out what works, what needs improvement, and which elements are crucial to attaining the author’s goals.
Further References. Before you clarify your position on a research piece, it can be required to include pertinent external research articles to demonstrate the publication’s significance and methodology.
Summary or Conclusion and Your Opinion The hardest part of writing an article critique is typically the end. Here is where you must defend your position. The secret is to simply express how the piece affected you, how it benefited you, or what defects you discovered, while always citing pertinent details.
Undoubtedly, you may need to present a different structure, but sticking to the one described above strikes the ideal balance between expressing your findings, your point of view, and the general variables. Keep in mind that your article critique must include both the positive findings and the negative aspects you find.
Journal vs. research article: How to Write an Article Critique
The strategy you must follow while composing a research article critique versus handling a general journal article is the main distinction. Research articles typically serve as empirical or primary sources. The author’s introduction, the methods that were employed, the samples and surveys, the findings of a particular research study, and the discussion of the results that have been attained must all be taken into account in your critique style.
Now that you’re dealing with general review articles, which mostly represent secondary sources with a synthesis of specific material already contained, you should work with the subject and its significance for a broad audience. In other words, the goal always varies. More of a summary should be included than the analytical study work. Returning to the research paper critique, consider the issue and check to see if the author offers any commentary. After that, concentrate on the author’s research questions or hypotheses and a study of the pertinent literature.
Don’t forget to check the bibliographic information if it is given, explain its relevance to the review, and confirm that any content cited in the article has been correctly referenced. To prevent potential plagiarism difficulties, keep in mind that you should also cite your sources in your article critique using the appropriate writing style (APA, MLA, or Chicago).
Example of the Article Critique
Take the 2003 presentation by V. Iliadou and S. Lakovides entitled “Contribution of Psychoacoustics and Neuroaudiology in Revealing Correlation of Mental Disorders With Central Auditory Processing Disorders” as an illustration of the article. The brief excerpt, an example of an article critique, is provided below to give you an idea of how it’s done.
The essay exemplifies intriguing and cutting-edge research in the area of psychoacoustics by concentrating on both neuroaudiological and electrical components of auditory pathway activation. The difficulties of Central Auditory Processing Disorders have been addressed by the authors, hence the article has to do with Psychiatry. In order to establish the approach and adequate sample sizes needed to preserve the significance of psychoacoustic aspects when viewed through the lens of neurological or mental diseases, more than 564 papers from the MEDLINE database were consulted. The use of several tests and investigations that were carried out with the use of auditory simulation techniques is what distinguishes this research from others. Each of the sources given is correctly cited and provides enough background information to understand why certain scientific features have been highlighted.
The authors present a unique balance between psychoacoustic and electrophysiologic testing dependent on the type of lesion chosen. It must be highlighted that the various sorts of mental diseases have been taken into consideration to give well-weighted study. The article meets its objective of presenting different research based on the efforts of qualified professionals in Psychiatry, Neurology, Neuropsychology, and Pediatric Psychology among other fields. The relevance of the article also resides in the need of handling multiple learning issues including dyslexia, ADHD, and autism differently since the auditory part is studied at greater depth. Although the educational aspect is covered briefly as the paper is more evidence-based, it leaves ample space for important scientific study.
As you can see, the objective is to explain and highlight why the item is significant and what exactly makes it distinctive. Try giving comparable proof from the critique article either with the quotes or by paraphrasing.
Affordable & Reliable Writing an Article Critique Help
If the concept of article critique still seems too difficult to you or you would like to get your critique assignment verified in terms of clarity, style, or plagiarism, the support is available there. Regardless if you need to learn how to write an article review or struggle with critique writing, we know how to make things easier. Turn to our authors who are ready to help you 24/7. Keep your challenges resolved, meet the deadlines and avoid plagiarism. Just make your order with AcademicWits and let our pros handle with even the most challenging article criticism or any other college work.